Laudato Si

Lines of Approach and Action

This is an extract from the IMBISA Laudato Sì Manual

Chapter V of the manual addresses the question of what we can and must do. Analyses are not enough: we need proposals “for dialogue and action which would involve each of us individually no less than international policy” (LS 15). They will “help us to escape the spiral of self-destruction which currently engulfs us” (LS 163). For Pope Francis, it is imperative that the development of real approaches is not done in an ideological, superficial or reductionist way. For this, dialogue is essential for achieving hopeful outcomes. “There are certain environmental issues where it is not easy to achieve a broad consensus. […] the Church does not presume to settle scientific questions or to replace politics. But I want to encourage an honest and open debate, so that particular interests or ideologies will not prejudice the common good” (LS 188).

On this basis, Pope Francis is not afraid to judge international dynamics severely: “Recent World Summits on the environment have failed to live up to expectations because, due to lack of political will, they were unable to reach truly meaningful and effective global agreements on the environment” (LS 166). And he asks, “What would induce anyone, at this stage, to hold on to power only to be remembered for their inability to take action when it was urgent and necessary to do so?” (LS 57). Instead, what is needed, as the Popes have repeated several times, starting with Pacem in Terris, are forms and instruments for global governance (LS 175): “an agreement on systems of governance for the whole range of the so-called “global commons”. “The environment is one of those goods that cannot be adequately safeguarded or promoted by market forces” (190, Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church).

In this chapter, Pope Francis insists on development of honesty and transparent decision-making processes, in order to “discern” which policies and business initiatives can bring about “genuine integral development” (185). In particular, proper environmental impact study on “business ventures and projects demands transparent political processes involving a free exchange of views. On the other hand, the forms of corruption which conceal the actual environmental impact of a given project in exchange for favors usually produce specious agreements which fail to inform adequately and do not allow for full debate” (LS 182).

The most significant appeal is addressed to those who hold political office, so that they avoid “a mentality of “efficiency” and “immediacy”“ (LS 181) that is so prevalent today: “but if they are courageous, they will attest to their God-given dignity and leave behind a testimony of selfless responsibility” (LS 181).

Suggested Activities

Identify problems /issues in your neighborhood and enter into dialogue at different levels from family, small Christian communities, sodalities, community, at school and in a Parish, etc;

  1. What is the cause of the problem?
  2. What can you as individual, families, Sodalities, Community, Parish and Municipality do to address the problem?
  3. What Christian Values, policies and regulations are there to help deal with the problem?